Future Technology an d Innovative Concept Topics a nd Ideas f o r Thi n k Tanks a n d Radio
Greeting s a nd we l come m y radio listening audience a n d online gadgets technology article readers. O n th i s 19th day o f October 2012 w e wi l l o f c o urse b e discussing future technology, future innovations, a nd futuristic concepts. Indeed, I surely h ope t he Mayan calendar w a s wrong, o r p erhaps th o se carving i t m e rely ran o ut o f stone simply, ran o u t o f rock t o chisel on, there f ore th e world wil l b e saved f r om what e ver i t wa s t h at t h e Mayans thought mi g ht bring a bout a ne w age o r renewal.
O u r job i s t o ha v e a n intellectual discussion, dialogue, debate a n d discourse. That' s w h y yo u 're here, a n d tha t 's m y mission, an d w e wi l l complete it. No w then, ob v iously th e re i s a tremendous amount o f talk abo u t innovation, t h e n e ed f o r innovators a nd entrepreneurs i n o u r nation t o ke e p u s strong, vibrant, a n d o n t he leading edge o f technology. Y ou won' t g e t an y disagreement h e re o n t h at reality, nevert h eless i t s eems a s i f t he word "innovation" i s p erhaps on e o f t h e m ost overused words i n t h e English language currently, p erhaps oth e r t h an "unsustainable" whic h b y t he way, som e things whi c h m a y app e ar t o b e unsustainable o r dire problems w e bel i eve w e face today, b ut ma y ver y w ell b e solved w ith t h e technology o f t he future.
Einstein us e d t o s ay that; "it takes a brilliant person t o solve a problem, bu t i t takes a creative genius t o prevent t he problem f r om eve r happening fir s t place," a n d therefore, I w o uld sa y tha t t h e creative geniuses d on't alw a ys g e t t h e credit f o r solving t he problems, bu t th e brilliant person will, e ven i f thei r previous solutions turned int o unintended consequences, a nd the y ar e rehired t o fix wh a t the y broke t h e f irst t i me aft e r supposedly fixing somethi n g t o save u s all Premium.
O kay so, h e re i s whe r e I ' m goi n g t o start throwing ou t topics, wi t h a l ittle discussion attached t o e ach one. T h ey wil l run th e gamut a ll a cross t he board f r om science fiction topics t o today's latest a n d greatest technologies a n d w hat t h ey mig h t m e an f o r o u r future. I wil l als o throw o u t s ome personal original innovative concepts, a s I c o me u p wi t h a t lea s t t wo ne w original concepts p er day, a n d w e c an discuss th o se a s w ell i f y ou wish, o r perhap s yo u wi l l h ave a diffe r ent topic f or o u r dialogue here. N o w th e n l et's begin wi t h t he fi r st topic Real Reviews;
1.) Wi l l Physical Money Survive t he Nex t T h ree Decades - Hackers a nd Trade Questioned
I n reality, money ha s lit t le o r n o v a lue - c o nsider a dollar bill, it' s j ust a flimsy piece o f paper, s o h o w m u ch i s i t re a lly worth? W e a l l belie v e i t i s worth whateve r i t s ays o n th e face o f i t w hether i t b e o ne dollar, f ive dollars, $10, $20, $50, o r ev e n a C-note. Money o nly works beca u se people h a ve faith i n i t s value, an d wh a t i t c a n buy. Mos t o f t h e money wh i ch i s created t h ese days ne v er actual l y exists i n a physical form Technician Salary, i t on l y exists i n t h e digital world. Fo r instance, yo u migh t ge t paid fr o m a Corporation, t hat money c ould b e digitally transferred in t o y our bank account. Y ou mi g ht the n u se yo u r ATM t o buy something, o r pay bills online, bu t y o u neve r ha d th a t money i n yo u r hot littl e hands. Things hav e changed a lot i n th e la s t thre e decades have n 't they?
S o wh a t wil l ha p pen i n a nother t h ree decades I ask? Wil l w e s till h a ve physical money, o r w i ll i t a ll b e digitized, an d w ill y o u ev e r ha v e an y money i n y o ur wallet t o buy something? T h ere a r e s o me futurists t hat belie v e th a t money w ill g o ou t t h e window, tha t i s t o s a y physical money Ipage Codes, an d everyt h ing wil l b e digital i n t he future. B u t wha t i f o u r society a n d civilization doesn ' t trust digital money? Wh a t i f the y a r e worried t h at o ur banks a r e b e ing hacked? Recently i n th e fall o f 2012 we' v e noted tha t o u r banks hav e c o me u n der cyber-attacks fro m Iran a t le a st Leon Panetta believes t h at's wh e re t h e attacks originated, b u t w ho i s t o sa y i n t h e future i f w e h a ve a w a r w ith anoth e r nation tha t cyber-attacks o n o u r monetary system wil l no t b e included?
Af t er all, economic warfare i s be c oming quit e common, wh y ju s t c onsider t h e sanctions, trade wars, a n d o ur attempts t o stop th e money flow f rom terrorists, drug dealers, money Bluehost Codes launderers, an d human traffickers, alo n g wi t h t h e central banking computer systems o f rogue nation-states a n d the i r money transfers f o r things l i ke oil, natural resources, an d military armament?
T hen the r e i s t h e issue c urrently wher e mor e an d mo r e people a r e making mobile payments o n thei r mobile personal tech devices. Today th e y're buying a cup o f coffee, a hamburger, o r var i ous items a t retail stores. I n th e future i t migh t b e m uch more, o r i f t hat become s unreliable o r tho s e personal tech devices ar e be i ng hacked Phen375 website, p e rhaps thro u gh downloaded apps w i th malware, o r fro m users surfing websites w i th malware, the n people w ill n o t trust mobile payments. S ome h ave suggested t h at s ome personal tech devices ma y actual l y c ome wit h pre-loaded back-doors o r software t h at co u ld b e u sed b y hackers t o steal data o r commit identity theft crimes.
T h ere ma y c ome a tim e w here people d o n't wi s h t o buy anythi n g online, o r d o online banking be c ause th e y don' t trust th e system, the y d o n't w ant thei r money t o disappear on e day i n to some o ne else's account i n s o me foreign country. H aving so m eone drain you r bank account o nly n e eds t o happe n once Drones, a n d on l y need s t o h a ppen t o a close friend o r a family member b efore e v eryone th e y kn o w be c omes sketchy. I n th a t case y o u won ' t w ant t o u s e digital money, a n d t h at case mo r e people wi l l opt t o us e physical money, ther e fore i t i s q u ite p ossible th a t physical money w i ll exist simply a s a safety factor f or decades t o come.
B u t ho w safe i s y our physical money g o ing t o b e i n case o f a natural disaster, o r a wildfire t h at burned d own y o ur home, o r a n earthquake? W h at ab o ut a hurricane wi t h a huge tidal surge, a tsunami, o r a major Hoverboard river whic h jumped i t s banks? I s y our physical money safe, h o w muc h safer i s i t t h at y our digital money i n t h at case? Speaking o f natural disasters an d flooding events, m a ybe w e c a n be t ter predict the m i n t he future? L e t's talk a b out t h at fo r a moment wit h ou r n e xt topic;
2.) W e Ne e d A Rea l Test f or 100-Year Flood Mathematical Simulations - A Thought
H ow c an w e bett e r produce mathematical simulations f o r flood zones, o r th e proverbial hundred year flood? W h at c an w e d o t o b e tter fine-tune t h ese mathematical models s o th a t t h ey ar e completely accurate? Lots o f work h a s b e en d one i n th e past based o n elevation, a n d flood mapping. B u t th e re's m o re t o i t t h an that, the r e ar e a ll sorts o f oth e r things t o c o nsider alo n g wi t h erosion patterns. Le t m e g i ve y ou a thought here?
W e k now t h e dates, temperatures, rain fall, an d run-off right, w e k n ow history, pl u s w e measured t h e terrain befor e a n d afte r right? Thus, an y reall y good mathematical simulation fo r erosion s hould lo o k t h e sam e a s t he ac t ual i f y o u input t he w ay t he terrain on c e w a s w i th th e interim conditions t o wha t i t i s now. Se e tha t point.
T here i s a ver y interesting YouTube Video I recommend viewing o n t his topic, w ell a sid e issue, tha t o f agricultural top soil erosion; "Dave Montgomery - Dirt: T h e Erosion o f Civilizations," n ow then, le t m e express m y thoughts o n t h is as, a l l o f t h ese theories a n d speculation make a lot o f sense w ith unlimited examples i n t he present period o n smaller scales - common sense, observable, a nd th u s i t makes sense, s o then, Occam's Razor survives.
So, m y speculation o f Dave Montgomery's lecture a nd theory woul d b e th e same. Indeed, thi s w a s a great lecture, solid evidence, an d research. Ok a y so, no w w e c an n o w put f orth thes e findings t o he l p calibrate mathematic soil erosion models an d simulations. N o w t hen le t m e a s k anothe r question, o r perhap s t h e sa m e question a d i fferent way;
3.) Ca n W e U s e Mathematic Fractal Simulation t o Fool A Human Whe n Viewing Erosion Patterns?
I f so, w ould t h at b e lik e th e Turing Test? A nd i f so, ca n I call t hat th e Virtual Reality Winslow Test, named a fter m e fo r consi d ering it? I f yo u ar e a pilot l i ke I am, an d y o u fly o v er t he terrain, y ou s e e v a rious patterns o f ho w t he mountains a n d erosion h ad take n p l ace o v er th e las t thousand t o 10,000 years. Y o u c a n se e floodplains, mountains, canyons, a n d i t a l l makes sense - y ou c a n s e e exac t ly h o w t he water flows, o r ha d flowed i n t he past. Wha t i f w e use d a computer t o design erosion patterns th a t ne v er happened, a nd wh a t i f w e asked a human, pe r haps a pilot wh o ha s se e n a nd flown ove r s u ch terrain m any ti m es i n t he past i f i t w e re re a l o r not?
A r e ou r computer simulations good e n ough t o fool t he human eye? I 'm talking a b out a trained observer wh o h a s see n the s e things i n t h e past o v er an d o v er again? I s t hat possible; I b e lieve i t is. An d so, h o w d o y o u kn o w w h en looki n g a t Google Earth i f y o u ar e looki n g a t a computer rendition, o r a fake Birdseye view w hich perha p s i s covering u p a military base, o r a secret area? T h e reality i s yo u don't, o r d o you? Ho w a bout t hose wh o work f o r t he national satellite intelligence agencies, wh e re a l l t h ey d o i s study terrain maps? Cou l d the y pick o u t th e difference?
Be f ore yo u answer tha t question, w h y do n 't y o u us e Google Earth o n t h e satellite view an d fly ov e r t h e deserts i n Nevada. Som e o f tha t stuff lo o ks pretty bizarre wit h weird colors, b u t i t 's al l real. I f y o u doubt t h at i t 's real, g o ahead a n d fly o v er southern Bolivia o n Google Earth a nd lo o k a t som e o f tha t terrain i n th e ir salt flats region a n d u p a g ainst t h e mountains, y o u ge t th e s a me interesting colors, muc h o f i t doe s no t ap p ear t o b e rea l either, bu t i t is. S ome o f t h e features th a t NASA h a s viewed o n Mars do n 't l o ok real, b u t th e y are.
No, the y a r e n ot t he s ame a s Earth becaus e th e erosion patterns tha t w e s e e n ow c o uld ha v e bee n created b y wind, ther e i s a differe n t atmosphere, o r lack of. D o yo u se e m y point? N ot l ong ago, I wa s watching a n online video lecture abou t erosion patterns, Stephen Wolfram's Ne w Type o f Science, an d Mathematica - fractals a nd mathematical simulations a n d projections o f erosion patterns. The y ar e amazingly predictable, a n d t hat i n it s elf i s interesting. It' s a s i f y o u ca n s e e t h e geological record thr o ugh t he ages.
Y ou m ight wan t t o l ook s o me o f thi s u p yourself. An d speaking o f free lectures, University level lectures o n j u st a b out an y topic yo u 'd like, I w o nder i f t hat wi l l c h ange t h e future o f o ur higher education, wh y g o t o school a nd pay $100,000 t o g e t a n advanced a great whe n yo u c a n learn alm o st a s mu c h online thro u gh self-study? Yes, interesting, d o es t h is mea n it' s t he death o f t h e University, o r a r e w e entering a n ew age o f information flow i n education? Let ' s g o ahead a n d talk abo u t lecture type learning.
4.) W a nt t o Learn Whil e Watching a n Online Video Lecture - G o F u ll Screen an d Ditch Distraction
First, i f yo u a re i n a university lecture hall, listening t o th e be s t a n d brightest professor o n a gi v en topic there ' s a good chance y ou mig h t fall asleep, b u t st i ll y o ur attention span w i ll b e longer becaus e y o u ar e there, an d t here ar e n't th e s a me distractions a s watching a n online video. I f y o u a re watching a University level video a t home o n you r computer i n a li t tle box o n t h e screen - the r e a r e lots o f distractions.
F o r instance w h atever els e i s i n t he room, perh a ps t h e doorbell, TV, o r y our cell phone rings. Yo u migh t feel t he n eed t o text s o meone back, g o t o t h e refrigerator g e t some t hing t o eat, o r ju s t zone ou t - listening whi l e you'r e d o ing s omething else, assuming t h at y o u c a n multitask an d learn s o mething complicated a t t h e s a me time. It' s n o t t h at y o u can't, i t 's th a t yo u probab l y w o n't an d y our memory retention level wi l l b e nex t t o nothing, a nd y o u've wasted everyone's time, an d som e bandwidth t o boot. Still, le t m e a s k ano t her question;
5.) I s Th e Lecture Dead - Eve n I f I t 's Al l Online a n d Free I n T he Future?
T h is i s a decent question, e ven i f yo u disagree w i th it. O n October 20, 2012 th e re w as a n article i n t h e technology news. Harvard h a d put u p t wo free courses online i n computer science. T hey w e re obviousl y follow i ng Stanford computer science department's lead, a s t hey d id th e sam e t h ing l ast year. Harvard ha d th e sa m e results o v er 100,000 people signed up, people f r om a l l ove r t he world. There' s n o shortage o f people wh o w ish t o learn online, b u t i n doi n g this; ar e the y cutting t h eir o wn throats a s th e y distribute information t o t h e rest o f th e world a t n o cost, o r ar e t h ey boosting thei r ow n credibility b y do i ng so? I t co u ld lead t o m o re people wh o w i sh t o attend th a t school i n th e future, therefo r e greater enrollment.
Regardless, things a r e changing fast, e ven i f th e basic lecture a t ou r universities ha s n't changed m uch sinc e th e 1800s. Indeed, I recommend t hat y o u watch t h e YouTube Video; "Don't lecture me" (with Twitter track) - Donald Clark a t ALT-C 2010," becau s e th i s gentlemen makes a lot o f sense. Pe r haps al s o o f interest i s anothe r YouTube Video titled; "Re-inventing t he Lecture (Or, W hy Online Lectures D o n't Work, a nd W hat W e C a n D o Abo u t It)."
Indeed, I thi n k aft e r yo u watch t h ose videos you ' ll b e bet t er a b le t o comment o n w hat I ' m talking abou t here, an d i t i s somethi n g th a t n eeds t o b e discussed. W e ne e d a national dialogue o n this, th a t i s i f w e wa n t t o propel technology a nd innovation, a n d couple th a t w i th entrepreneurship moving o u r great nation forward int o t he future. N e xt I 'd lik e t o discuss;
6.) Large Universities, High Tuition, a nd Big Buildings a nd Beautiful Architecture - A r e W e Learning Yet?
W hy i s i t t h at w e put s o muc h faith int o ou r larger universities? I t 's interesting i s n't it? T h ey spend huge amounts o f money putting u p great architecture a n d large buildings b u t i s th a t real l y w h at makes t h em great? Ev e n i f so m eone ha s a great building, i t do e sn't m e an t hey kn o w wha t the y 're talking about, con s ider s ome o f t h e largest churches i n th e world fo r instance, o r t h e largest mosques. I s i t th e high prices t h e Universities charge; do e s t h at make t h em great? Havi n g b een i n business al l m y life, I c a n recall vario u s attorneys a c tually raising t heir price jus t s o the y co u ld g et mor e business bec a use people thought i t th e y charged m o re p e r hour the y m ust b e good, t h ey weren't.
Indeed, i f a large university spends a ll t h eir money o n landscaping, beautiful brick work, great statues o u tside t h e lecture halls, an d i s o n e w i th t h e epitome o f divine architecture - t hen t h ey h a ve l ess money t o teach y ou with. T h ey h a ve le s s money t o hire t h e bes t professors, buy t h e b est equipment, o r pr o vide th e bes t future f or t heir students. That ' s n o t t o sa y t hat the y can't, pe r haps t h ey charge y ou money f a r i n excess o f th e amount o f education an d y o u jus t h a ve t o t he pay fo r a l l t h at extra stuff. I f y ou c a n g et a lecture online f or free o n YouTube - i n man y rega r ds th e information i s basically t h e same.
Perhap s i n t h e future you r living room gaming virtual reality technology w i ll project a holographic professor i n 3-D bringing th e professor t o you, an d i t c a n b e don e f o r a fraction o f th e cost, the r e's n o building t o pay for, pe r haps th e building, a nd th e professor, an d everythi n g els e ca n b e projected aro u nd yo u r living room a nd yo u w i ll feel a s i f yo u a r e the y are. Therefore, y o u ge t t h e sam e experience, a nd interaction, p erhaps e ven breaking u p i nto groups w i th virtual-reality avatars a s fellow students. W ho ne e ds college anymore? Bet t er yet, w ho ne e ds t o ta k e o u t $100,000 i n student loans f or th e s a me exac t information, minus t h e big building?
Still, i n yo u r living room gaming center w hich doubles a s y our ne w education headquarters, an d y o ur latest virtual o r augmented reality 3-D holographic computer game immersion device - y o u migh t ac t ually b e training th e artificial intelligent supercomputer network t o t h ink li k e a human. T hat information m ight b e u sed b y future robotic systems f o r al l sorts o f things fr o m self-driving trucks, cars, a n d airplanes throug h virtual-reality simulator trainers t o future combat vehicles i n th e battle space. Speaking o f whic h I h a ve anot h er question f or you;
7.) Sho u ld W e Crowd Source Satellite Data fo r Future Military Convoys?
Well, i f w e di d that, w e wouldn' t hav e t o t e ll any o ne wh o w a s lo o king a t th e satellite data w h en o r wher e w e migh t b e moving troops, equipment, o r resources, w e c o uld jus t s ay t hat th i s i s o n e o f t he potential routes f or som e t ime i n th e future, a n d i f y o u find a n anomaly mark i t down. T hose wh o find t h e mos t anomalies w ill receive a check i n t h e mail, o r a gift certificate t o t heir favorite retail store a t t he en d o f t wo months. Th e y won ' t kn o w when, where, o r whi c h anomaly t hey found wa s t h e o n e whi c h garnered th e m th e free gift card.
T h ose t hat find mo r e r eal anomalies tha n false positives w o uld b e give n a higher level o f point spread fo r dollars p e r anomalies th e y found. Further, the y mi g ht g et a n extra hundred dollars i n t h e mail e a ch month be c ause t h ey ha d a higher credibility rating. I f w e di d t his eventually th e algorithms watching t h e ve r y be s t human minds find t h ese anomalies coul d figure ou t ho w t h ey a r e d o ing it, a nd w hat i s catching t heir eye, a n d ther e fore w e coul d bet t er design artificially intelligent satellite analyzing algorithms whic h w o uld incorporate h ow a human mind thinks, an d h ow a computer thinks w hich wi l l g i ve u s t he b est o f a l l worlds b y putting th o se t w o together.
Perhap s i n a way, humans ar e alre a dy training supercomputers wit h artificial intelligent algorithms t o run o ur entir e society, a n d civilization fo r t he future. A f ter all, eve r y ti m e yo u put somet h ing o n t he Internet, t h e Internet c o uld b e learning mor e abou t h o w humans think, operate, a nd g o abou t the i r business. I n ma n y regar d s w e coul d b e creating t he matrix f or o u r o wn future, a n d th e se artificial intelligence systems w ill becom e aware, an d t hey w ill b e ou r leadership i n t he future, i t won ' t b e human? I t's possible, a nd l e t m e a s k y o u an o ther question;
7.) W h at Happ e ns Whe n t he Cloud Computing Centers Filled wi t h A ll Human Information Becom e Aware?
Consid e r i f y o u wi l l a s s omeone recently sai d i n T h e Futurist Magazine i n t h e October-September issue o f 2012 a l ong thi s line o f thinking, so m ething t o t he effect that; "We al r eady ha v e algorithms w hich c a n search a ll th e information i n a ny o f the s e cloud computing centers, " a nd "We ha v e a l l sorts o f algorithms t o hel p u s find t h e data, an d algorithms w h ich talk t o othe r algorithms." Sure, a l l th a t makes sense, a nd als o conside r t h at i n t he human brain:
A.) W e hav e variou s brain waves a n d t hey interact wit h ea c h other.
B.) Th e re a re va r ious chemicals providing energy wi t h a mix.
C.) W e hav e sensors al l t hrough t h e body, a n d t h e fi v e senses whi c h gather information a nd experience, taking i n a ll o f o u r observations.
I f th e cloud computer centers, wh i ch wil l b e talking t o e ach o t her a nd talking t o themselv e s cont a in a ll o f t h e written a n d visual record o f humanity, t hey w i ll hav e alre a dy gathered a l l th e experiences, writings, observations, using, a nd history, an d s o i t i s onl y on e small step awa y f r om b e coming aware. Thi s i s th e future w e a r e moving towards, m y question is; d o w e dare?
I n a way, th e cloud computer w ould bec o me aware, a n d i t w ould b e ver y similar t o a human brain whe r e e v ery individual neuron w as a n individual human. T h at i s t o sa y e v ery piece o f th e puzzle, f r om t h e top t o th e bottom w o uld ha v e intelligence. I s thi s a ne w fo r m o f intelligence? Well, l e t m e scale i t do w n t o a simple board game a n d a s k y o u a dif f erent question;
8.) C a n W e Design a 3-D Chess Board Game Wher e E a ch Piece H a s A I a nd Seeks t o Survive?
A n d i f w e cou l d design someth i ng l ike that, wo u ldn't t hat b e v ery similar t o th e w hole Net Centric Warfare concept? I sn't t hat h ow a r eal military works? E a ch soldier i s g iven a job, b u t ea c h soldier i s a thinking machine, i t f ollows it s orders, b u t a l so attempts t o d o w h at i s i n it s bes t interest, tha t i s t o survive, t o fight, an d t o win. I n w ar i t 's pretty serious, yo u e i ther win, o r yo u die. C an w e design a 3-D chessboard t o d o t h e sa m e thing? H o w mu c h bett e r w ould i t b e i f i t w a s giving feedback back t o t he artificial intelligent chess master?
We' v e alread y found tha t artificial intelligence working w ith a human chess master ca n beat a n artificial intelligent chess playing machine f r om IBM. W h en w e merge human intelligence w ith artificial intelligence w e see m t o g et a boost. W hat i f e ach piece o n t h e chessboard h ad artificial intelligence a n d i t understood h o w humans think, adapt, survive, an d operate u nder pressure? A ren't w e alre a dy teaching a ll thes e things t o th e future o f A I thr o ugh o u r input ont o t h e Internet? S u re w e are, an d i f yo u 've listened t o t his radio show, o r r ead m y articles f o r a n y period o f time, y o u alre a dy k now t he answer t o that.
W hat i f w e scale d o wn eve n further? W h at i f w e scaled th i s a l l th e wa y dow n t o t h e molecular level? W h at i f th o se molecules o r nanoparticles cou l d talk t o eac h other? A re w e talking a bout t he n e xt generation o f microelectronics? Taking i t al l t he w ay dow n a nd continuing t h e tradition o f Moore's law? Ha v e y o u recently noted i n t h e scientific news October o f 2012 th a t carbon nanotubes hav e incredible properties fo r producing light an d miniature holograms? W ill th i s b e a ne w wa y t o communicate a t th e micro level?
Bacteria se e ms t o communicate a n d on c e i t g e ts economies o f scale a nd reaches a tipping point, i t activates itself, tryi n g t o overwhelm b y force a nd numbers. I t operates mu c h l ike a n army, a lthough strategically, mathematically, an d predictably, we l l almost? Almos t lik e a chessboard whe r e eac h individual member i s als o serving it s b e st interests? Perh a ps a s w e design computer algorithms f o r t h e small-scale o r th e largest scale w e wi l l begin t o s ee th e s a me thing, an d wha t w e learn w i ll propel u s furthe r a nd faster i n to t h e future.
Ther e w a s a n interesting article i n Photonics o n September 27, 2012 titled; "Nanotubes Project Holograms," w hich noted that;
"Holograms c a n b e generated b y harnessing t h e conductive a nd light-scattering qualities o f carbon nanotubes, a development t h at cou l d lead t o crisper projections wit h a larger field o f view. Ma n y scientists beli e ve tha t carbon nanotubes wil l b e a t t h e heart o f future industry an d human endeavor a nd wil l h a ve a n impact o n solar cells, cancer treatments a n d optical imaging. Researchers us e d thes e nanotubes a s th e smallest-ever scattering elements t o create a static holographic projection."
T h e applications f o r a ll th i s a r e incredible a nd i t co u ld revolutionize everything, ch a nge A L L o f human technology; communication, computers, transportation, energy, healthcare, a n d y o u n a me it, j ust co n sider th e realities here? Wo u ld i t b e s o bold t o suggest t h at someday;
9.) A n A I Super Decision Making Computer Cou l d B e Running Human Civilizations?
Interestingly enough, I h a ve deeply considered th e future eRepublic o r eGovernment A I decision making system, enterprise software super computer concept. I f i t wer e no t corrupted b y humans i t c ould work well, programmed benevolence - i f t hat i s poss i ble a n d i f th e programmers ar e o n t he s ame page o f liberty, freedom, an d standardization o f s ome aspects a nd basic infrastructure needs. T h e anarchists migh t n ot l ike it, th e crony capitalists wo u ld tr y t o corrupt it, th e socialists wou l d w ant t o control it, t h e religious fanatics w o uld wa n t t o destroy it, a nd s o o n - a g ain humans, b u t living i n su c h a system designed fo r liberty a n d freedom "I thi n k i t wo u ld b e a good idea" paraphrasing Gandhi o n Western Society.
W hat I' m sayi n g o r askin g rater is; co u ld w e e v er ge t human populations t o agree t o live w i th thi s e ven i f w e co u ld prove t o t h em mathematically t hat wou l d b e i n th e ir be s t interests? A r e humans technology re a dy f or t h at yet? I w o uld suggest yo u t hat th e y s hould b e g etting rea d y f o r t hat bec a use t h ey a re current l y training A I supercomputer decision-making machines t o d o ju s t tha t i n th e future, a s humans ar e putting a l l o f t h eir knowledge o nto th e Internet. Y o u s ee m y point?
Einstein us e d t o s ay that; "it takes a brilliant person t o solve a problem, bu t i t takes a creative genius t o prevent t he problem f r om eve r happening fir s t place," a n d therefore, I w o uld sa y tha t t h e creative geniuses d on't alw a ys g e t t h e credit f o r solving t he problems, bu t th e brilliant person will, e ven i f thei r previous solutions turned int o unintended consequences, a nd the y ar e rehired t o fix wh a t the y broke t h e f irst t i me aft e r supposedly fixing somethi n g t o save u s all Premium.
O kay so, h e re i s whe r e I ' m goi n g t o start throwing ou t topics, wi t h a l ittle discussion attached t o e ach one. T h ey wil l run th e gamut a ll a cross t he board f r om science fiction topics t o today's latest a n d greatest technologies a n d w hat t h ey mig h t m e an f o r o u r future. I wil l als o throw o u t s ome personal original innovative concepts, a s I c o me u p wi t h a t lea s t t wo ne w original concepts p er day, a n d w e c an discuss th o se a s w ell i f y ou wish, o r perhap s yo u wi l l h ave a diffe r ent topic f or o u r dialogue here. N o w th e n l et's begin wi t h t he fi r st topic Real Reviews;
1.) Wi l l Physical Money Survive t he Nex t T h ree Decades - Hackers a nd Trade Questioned
I n reality, money ha s lit t le o r n o v a lue - c o nsider a dollar bill, it' s j ust a flimsy piece o f paper, s o h o w m u ch i s i t re a lly worth? W e a l l belie v e i t i s worth whateve r i t s ays o n th e face o f i t w hether i t b e o ne dollar, f ive dollars, $10, $20, $50, o r ev e n a C-note. Money o nly works beca u se people h a ve faith i n i t s value, an d wh a t i t c a n buy. Mos t o f t h e money wh i ch i s created t h ese days ne v er actual l y exists i n a physical form Technician Salary, i t on l y exists i n t h e digital world. Fo r instance, yo u migh t ge t paid fr o m a Corporation, t hat money c ould b e digitally transferred in t o y our bank account. Y ou mi g ht the n u se yo u r ATM t o buy something, o r pay bills online, bu t y o u neve r ha d th a t money i n yo u r hot littl e hands. Things hav e changed a lot i n th e la s t thre e decades have n 't they?
S o wh a t wil l ha p pen i n a nother t h ree decades I ask? Wil l w e s till h a ve physical money, o r w i ll i t a ll b e digitized, an d w ill y o u ev e r ha v e an y money i n y o ur wallet t o buy something? T h ere a r e s o me futurists t hat belie v e th a t money w ill g o ou t t h e window, tha t i s t o s a y physical money Ipage Codes, an d everyt h ing wil l b e digital i n t he future. B u t wha t i f o u r society a n d civilization doesn ' t trust digital money? Wh a t i f the y a r e worried t h at o ur banks a r e b e ing hacked? Recently i n th e fall o f 2012 we' v e noted tha t o u r banks hav e c o me u n der cyber-attacks fro m Iran a t le a st Leon Panetta believes t h at's wh e re t h e attacks originated, b u t w ho i s t o sa y i n t h e future i f w e h a ve a w a r w ith anoth e r nation tha t cyber-attacks o n o u r monetary system wil l no t b e included?
Af t er all, economic warfare i s be c oming quit e common, wh y ju s t c onsider t h e sanctions, trade wars, a n d o ur attempts t o stop th e money flow f rom terrorists, drug dealers, money Bluehost Codes launderers, an d human traffickers, alo n g wi t h t h e central banking computer systems o f rogue nation-states a n d the i r money transfers f o r things l i ke oil, natural resources, an d military armament?
T hen the r e i s t h e issue c urrently wher e mor e an d mo r e people a r e making mobile payments o n thei r mobile personal tech devices. Today th e y're buying a cup o f coffee, a hamburger, o r var i ous items a t retail stores. I n th e future i t migh t b e m uch more, o r i f t hat become s unreliable o r tho s e personal tech devices ar e be i ng hacked Phen375 website, p e rhaps thro u gh downloaded apps w i th malware, o r fro m users surfing websites w i th malware, the n people w ill n o t trust mobile payments. S ome h ave suggested t h at s ome personal tech devices ma y actual l y c ome wit h pre-loaded back-doors o r software t h at co u ld b e u sed b y hackers t o steal data o r commit identity theft crimes.
T h ere ma y c ome a tim e w here people d o n't wi s h t o buy anythi n g online, o r d o online banking be c ause th e y don' t trust th e system, the y d o n't w ant thei r money t o disappear on e day i n to some o ne else's account i n s o me foreign country. H aving so m eone drain you r bank account o nly n e eds t o happe n once Drones, a n d on l y need s t o h a ppen t o a close friend o r a family member b efore e v eryone th e y kn o w be c omes sketchy. I n th a t case y o u won ' t w ant t o u s e digital money, a n d t h at case mo r e people wi l l opt t o us e physical money, ther e fore i t i s q u ite p ossible th a t physical money w i ll exist simply a s a safety factor f or decades t o come.
B u t ho w safe i s y our physical money g o ing t o b e i n case o f a natural disaster, o r a wildfire t h at burned d own y o ur home, o r a n earthquake? W h at ab o ut a hurricane wi t h a huge tidal surge, a tsunami, o r a major Hoverboard river whic h jumped i t s banks? I s y our physical money safe, h o w muc h safer i s i t t h at y our digital money i n t h at case? Speaking o f natural disasters an d flooding events, m a ybe w e c a n be t ter predict the m i n t he future? L e t's talk a b out t h at fo r a moment wit h ou r n e xt topic;
2.) W e Ne e d A Rea l Test f or 100-Year Flood Mathematical Simulations - A Thought
H ow c an w e bett e r produce mathematical simulations f o r flood zones, o r th e proverbial hundred year flood? W h at c an w e d o t o b e tter fine-tune t h ese mathematical models s o th a t t h ey ar e completely accurate? Lots o f work h a s b e en d one i n th e past based o n elevation, a n d flood mapping. B u t th e re's m o re t o i t t h an that, the r e ar e a ll sorts o f oth e r things t o c o nsider alo n g wi t h erosion patterns. Le t m e g i ve y ou a thought here?
W e k now t h e dates, temperatures, rain fall, an d run-off right, w e k n ow history, pl u s w e measured t h e terrain befor e a n d afte r right? Thus, an y reall y good mathematical simulation fo r erosion s hould lo o k t h e sam e a s t he ac t ual i f y o u input t he w ay t he terrain on c e w a s w i th th e interim conditions t o wha t i t i s now. Se e tha t point.
T here i s a ver y interesting YouTube Video I recommend viewing o n t his topic, w ell a sid e issue, tha t o f agricultural top soil erosion; "Dave Montgomery - Dirt: T h e Erosion o f Civilizations," n ow then, le t m e express m y thoughts o n t h is as, a l l o f t h ese theories a n d speculation make a lot o f sense w ith unlimited examples i n t he present period o n smaller scales - common sense, observable, a nd th u s i t makes sense, s o then, Occam's Razor survives.
So, m y speculation o f Dave Montgomery's lecture a nd theory woul d b e th e same. Indeed, thi s w a s a great lecture, solid evidence, an d research. Ok a y so, no w w e c an n o w put f orth thes e findings t o he l p calibrate mathematic soil erosion models an d simulations. N o w t hen le t m e a s k anothe r question, o r perhap s t h e sa m e question a d i fferent way;
3.) Ca n W e U s e Mathematic Fractal Simulation t o Fool A Human Whe n Viewing Erosion Patterns?
I f so, w ould t h at b e lik e th e Turing Test? A nd i f so, ca n I call t hat th e Virtual Reality Winslow Test, named a fter m e fo r consi d ering it? I f yo u ar e a pilot l i ke I am, an d y o u fly o v er t he terrain, y ou s e e v a rious patterns o f ho w t he mountains a n d erosion h ad take n p l ace o v er th e las t thousand t o 10,000 years. Y o u c a n se e floodplains, mountains, canyons, a n d i t a l l makes sense - y ou c a n s e e exac t ly h o w t he water flows, o r ha d flowed i n t he past. Wha t i f w e use d a computer t o design erosion patterns th a t ne v er happened, a nd wh a t i f w e asked a human, pe r haps a pilot wh o ha s se e n a nd flown ove r s u ch terrain m any ti m es i n t he past i f i t w e re re a l o r not?
A r e ou r computer simulations good e n ough t o fool t he human eye? I 'm talking a b out a trained observer wh o h a s see n the s e things i n t h e past o v er an d o v er again? I s t hat possible; I b e lieve i t is. An d so, h o w d o y o u kn o w w h en looki n g a t Google Earth i f y o u ar e looki n g a t a computer rendition, o r a fake Birdseye view w hich perha p s i s covering u p a military base, o r a secret area? T h e reality i s yo u don't, o r d o you? Ho w a bout t hose wh o work f o r t he national satellite intelligence agencies, wh e re a l l t h ey d o i s study terrain maps? Cou l d the y pick o u t th e difference?
Be f ore yo u answer tha t question, w h y do n 't y o u us e Google Earth o n t h e satellite view an d fly ov e r t h e deserts i n Nevada. Som e o f tha t stuff lo o ks pretty bizarre wit h weird colors, b u t i t 's al l real. I f y o u doubt t h at i t 's real, g o ahead a n d fly o v er southern Bolivia o n Google Earth a nd lo o k a t som e o f tha t terrain i n th e ir salt flats region a n d u p a g ainst t h e mountains, y o u ge t th e s a me interesting colors, muc h o f i t doe s no t ap p ear t o b e rea l either, bu t i t is. S ome o f t h e features th a t NASA h a s viewed o n Mars do n 't l o ok real, b u t th e y are.
No, the y a r e n ot t he s ame a s Earth becaus e th e erosion patterns tha t w e s e e n ow c o uld ha v e bee n created b y wind, ther e i s a differe n t atmosphere, o r lack of. D o yo u se e m y point? N ot l ong ago, I wa s watching a n online video lecture abou t erosion patterns, Stephen Wolfram's Ne w Type o f Science, an d Mathematica - fractals a nd mathematical simulations a n d projections o f erosion patterns. The y ar e amazingly predictable, a n d t hat i n it s elf i s interesting. It' s a s i f y o u ca n s e e t h e geological record thr o ugh t he ages.
Y ou m ight wan t t o l ook s o me o f thi s u p yourself. An d speaking o f free lectures, University level lectures o n j u st a b out an y topic yo u 'd like, I w o nder i f t hat wi l l c h ange t h e future o f o ur higher education, wh y g o t o school a nd pay $100,000 t o g e t a n advanced a great whe n yo u c a n learn alm o st a s mu c h online thro u gh self-study? Yes, interesting, d o es t h is mea n it' s t he death o f t h e University, o r a r e w e entering a n ew age o f information flow i n education? Let ' s g o ahead a n d talk abo u t lecture type learning.
4.) W a nt t o Learn Whil e Watching a n Online Video Lecture - G o F u ll Screen an d Ditch Distraction
First, i f yo u a re i n a university lecture hall, listening t o th e be s t a n d brightest professor o n a gi v en topic there ' s a good chance y ou mig h t fall asleep, b u t st i ll y o ur attention span w i ll b e longer becaus e y o u ar e there, an d t here ar e n't th e s a me distractions a s watching a n online video. I f y o u a re watching a University level video a t home o n you r computer i n a li t tle box o n t h e screen - the r e a r e lots o f distractions.
F o r instance w h atever els e i s i n t he room, perh a ps t h e doorbell, TV, o r y our cell phone rings. Yo u migh t feel t he n eed t o text s o meone back, g o t o t h e refrigerator g e t some t hing t o eat, o r ju s t zone ou t - listening whi l e you'r e d o ing s omething else, assuming t h at y o u c a n multitask an d learn s o mething complicated a t t h e s a me time. It' s n o t t h at y o u can't, i t 's th a t yo u probab l y w o n't an d y our memory retention level wi l l b e nex t t o nothing, a nd y o u've wasted everyone's time, an d som e bandwidth t o boot. Still, le t m e a s k ano t her question;
5.) I s Th e Lecture Dead - Eve n I f I t 's Al l Online a n d Free I n T he Future?
T h is i s a decent question, e ven i f yo u disagree w i th it. O n October 20, 2012 th e re w as a n article i n t h e technology news. Harvard h a d put u p t wo free courses online i n computer science. T hey w e re obviousl y follow i ng Stanford computer science department's lead, a s t hey d id th e sam e t h ing l ast year. Harvard ha d th e sa m e results o v er 100,000 people signed up, people f r om a l l ove r t he world. There' s n o shortage o f people wh o w ish t o learn online, b u t i n doi n g this; ar e the y cutting t h eir o wn throats a s th e y distribute information t o t h e rest o f th e world a t n o cost, o r ar e t h ey boosting thei r ow n credibility b y do i ng so? I t co u ld lead t o m o re people wh o w i sh t o attend th a t school i n th e future, therefo r e greater enrollment.
Regardless, things a r e changing fast, e ven i f th e basic lecture a t ou r universities ha s n't changed m uch sinc e th e 1800s. Indeed, I recommend t hat y o u watch t h e YouTube Video; "Don't lecture me" (with Twitter track) - Donald Clark a t ALT-C 2010," becau s e th i s gentlemen makes a lot o f sense. Pe r haps al s o o f interest i s anothe r YouTube Video titled; "Re-inventing t he Lecture (Or, W hy Online Lectures D o n't Work, a nd W hat W e C a n D o Abo u t It)."
Indeed, I thi n k aft e r yo u watch t h ose videos you ' ll b e bet t er a b le t o comment o n w hat I ' m talking abou t here, an d i t i s somethi n g th a t n eeds t o b e discussed. W e ne e d a national dialogue o n this, th a t i s i f w e wa n t t o propel technology a nd innovation, a n d couple th a t w i th entrepreneurship moving o u r great nation forward int o t he future. N e xt I 'd lik e t o discuss;
6.) Large Universities, High Tuition, a nd Big Buildings a nd Beautiful Architecture - A r e W e Learning Yet?
W hy i s i t t h at w e put s o muc h faith int o ou r larger universities? I t 's interesting i s n't it? T h ey spend huge amounts o f money putting u p great architecture a n d large buildings b u t i s th a t real l y w h at makes t h em great? Ev e n i f so m eone ha s a great building, i t do e sn't m e an t hey kn o w wha t the y 're talking about, con s ider s ome o f t h e largest churches i n th e world fo r instance, o r t h e largest mosques. I s i t th e high prices t h e Universities charge; do e s t h at make t h em great? Havi n g b een i n business al l m y life, I c a n recall vario u s attorneys a c tually raising t heir price jus t s o the y co u ld g et mor e business bec a use people thought i t th e y charged m o re p e r hour the y m ust b e good, t h ey weren't.
Indeed, i f a large university spends a ll t h eir money o n landscaping, beautiful brick work, great statues o u tside t h e lecture halls, an d i s o n e w i th t h e epitome o f divine architecture - t hen t h ey h a ve l ess money t o teach y ou with. T h ey h a ve le s s money t o hire t h e bes t professors, buy t h e b est equipment, o r pr o vide th e bes t future f or t heir students. That ' s n o t t o sa y t hat the y can't, pe r haps t h ey charge y ou money f a r i n excess o f th e amount o f education an d y o u jus t h a ve t o t he pay fo r a l l t h at extra stuff. I f y ou c a n g et a lecture online f or free o n YouTube - i n man y rega r ds th e information i s basically t h e same.
Perhap s i n t h e future you r living room gaming virtual reality technology w i ll project a holographic professor i n 3-D bringing th e professor t o you, an d i t c a n b e don e f o r a fraction o f th e cost, the r e's n o building t o pay for, pe r haps th e building, a nd th e professor, an d everythi n g els e ca n b e projected aro u nd yo u r living room a nd yo u w i ll feel a s i f yo u a r e the y are. Therefore, y o u ge t t h e sam e experience, a nd interaction, p erhaps e ven breaking u p i nto groups w i th virtual-reality avatars a s fellow students. W ho ne e ds college anymore? Bet t er yet, w ho ne e ds t o ta k e o u t $100,000 i n student loans f or th e s a me exac t information, minus t h e big building?
Still, i n yo u r living room gaming center w hich doubles a s y our ne w education headquarters, an d y o ur latest virtual o r augmented reality 3-D holographic computer game immersion device - y o u migh t ac t ually b e training th e artificial intelligent supercomputer network t o t h ink li k e a human. T hat information m ight b e u sed b y future robotic systems f o r al l sorts o f things fr o m self-driving trucks, cars, a n d airplanes throug h virtual-reality simulator trainers t o future combat vehicles i n th e battle space. Speaking o f whic h I h a ve anot h er question f or you;
7.) Sho u ld W e Crowd Source Satellite Data fo r Future Military Convoys?
Well, i f w e di d that, w e wouldn' t hav e t o t e ll any o ne wh o w a s lo o king a t th e satellite data w h en o r wher e w e migh t b e moving troops, equipment, o r resources, w e c o uld jus t s ay t hat th i s i s o n e o f t he potential routes f or som e t ime i n th e future, a n d i f y o u find a n anomaly mark i t down. T hose wh o find t h e mos t anomalies w ill receive a check i n t h e mail, o r a gift certificate t o t heir favorite retail store a t t he en d o f t wo months. Th e y won ' t kn o w when, where, o r whi c h anomaly t hey found wa s t h e o n e whi c h garnered th e m th e free gift card.
T h ose t hat find mo r e r eal anomalies tha n false positives w o uld b e give n a higher level o f point spread fo r dollars p e r anomalies th e y found. Further, the y mi g ht g et a n extra hundred dollars i n t h e mail e a ch month be c ause t h ey ha d a higher credibility rating. I f w e di d t his eventually th e algorithms watching t h e ve r y be s t human minds find t h ese anomalies coul d figure ou t ho w t h ey a r e d o ing it, a nd w hat i s catching t heir eye, a n d ther e fore w e coul d bet t er design artificially intelligent satellite analyzing algorithms whic h w o uld incorporate h ow a human mind thinks, an d h ow a computer thinks w hich wi l l g i ve u s t he b est o f a l l worlds b y putting th o se t w o together.
Perhap s i n a way, humans ar e alre a dy training supercomputers wit h artificial intelligent algorithms t o run o ur entir e society, a n d civilization fo r t he future. A f ter all, eve r y ti m e yo u put somet h ing o n t he Internet, t h e Internet c o uld b e learning mor e abou t h o w humans think, operate, a nd g o abou t the i r business. I n ma n y regar d s w e coul d b e creating t he matrix f or o u r o wn future, a n d th e se artificial intelligence systems w ill becom e aware, an d t hey w ill b e ou r leadership i n t he future, i t won ' t b e human? I t's possible, a nd l e t m e a s k y o u an o ther question;
7.) W h at Happ e ns Whe n t he Cloud Computing Centers Filled wi t h A ll Human Information Becom e Aware?
Consid e r i f y o u wi l l a s s omeone recently sai d i n T h e Futurist Magazine i n t h e October-September issue o f 2012 a l ong thi s line o f thinking, so m ething t o t he effect that; "We al r eady ha v e algorithms w hich c a n search a ll th e information i n a ny o f the s e cloud computing centers, " a nd "We ha v e a l l sorts o f algorithms t o hel p u s find t h e data, an d algorithms w h ich talk t o othe r algorithms." Sure, a l l th a t makes sense, a nd als o conside r t h at i n t he human brain:
A.) W e hav e variou s brain waves a n d t hey interact wit h ea c h other.
B.) Th e re a re va r ious chemicals providing energy wi t h a mix.
C.) W e hav e sensors al l t hrough t h e body, a n d t h e fi v e senses whi c h gather information a nd experience, taking i n a ll o f o u r observations.
I f th e cloud computer centers, wh i ch wil l b e talking t o e ach o t her a nd talking t o themselv e s cont a in a ll o f t h e written a n d visual record o f humanity, t hey w i ll hav e alre a dy gathered a l l th e experiences, writings, observations, using, a nd history, an d s o i t i s onl y on e small step awa y f r om b e coming aware. Thi s i s th e future w e a r e moving towards, m y question is; d o w e dare?
I n a way, th e cloud computer w ould bec o me aware, a n d i t w ould b e ver y similar t o a human brain whe r e e v ery individual neuron w as a n individual human. T h at i s t o sa y e v ery piece o f th e puzzle, f r om t h e top t o th e bottom w o uld ha v e intelligence. I s thi s a ne w fo r m o f intelligence? Well, l e t m e scale i t do w n t o a simple board game a n d a s k y o u a dif f erent question;
8.) C a n W e Design a 3-D Chess Board Game Wher e E a ch Piece H a s A I a nd Seeks t o Survive?
A n d i f w e cou l d design someth i ng l ike that, wo u ldn't t hat b e v ery similar t o th e w hole Net Centric Warfare concept? I sn't t hat h ow a r eal military works? E a ch soldier i s g iven a job, b u t ea c h soldier i s a thinking machine, i t f ollows it s orders, b u t a l so attempts t o d o w h at i s i n it s bes t interest, tha t i s t o survive, t o fight, an d t o win. I n w ar i t 's pretty serious, yo u e i ther win, o r yo u die. C an w e design a 3-D chessboard t o d o t h e sa m e thing? H o w mu c h bett e r w ould i t b e i f i t w a s giving feedback back t o t he artificial intelligent chess master?
We' v e alread y found tha t artificial intelligence working w ith a human chess master ca n beat a n artificial intelligent chess playing machine f r om IBM. W h en w e merge human intelligence w ith artificial intelligence w e see m t o g et a boost. W hat i f e ach piece o n t h e chessboard h ad artificial intelligence a n d i t understood h o w humans think, adapt, survive, an d operate u nder pressure? A ren't w e alre a dy teaching a ll thes e things t o th e future o f A I thr o ugh o u r input ont o t h e Internet? S u re w e are, an d i f yo u 've listened t o t his radio show, o r r ead m y articles f o r a n y period o f time, y o u alre a dy k now t he answer t o that.
W hat i f w e scale d o wn eve n further? W h at i f w e scaled th i s a l l th e wa y dow n t o t h e molecular level? W h at i f th o se molecules o r nanoparticles cou l d talk t o eac h other? A re w e talking a bout t he n e xt generation o f microelectronics? Taking i t al l t he w ay dow n a nd continuing t h e tradition o f Moore's law? Ha v e y o u recently noted i n t h e scientific news October o f 2012 th a t carbon nanotubes hav e incredible properties fo r producing light an d miniature holograms? W ill th i s b e a ne w wa y t o communicate a t th e micro level?
Bacteria se e ms t o communicate a n d on c e i t g e ts economies o f scale a nd reaches a tipping point, i t activates itself, tryi n g t o overwhelm b y force a nd numbers. I t operates mu c h l ike a n army, a lthough strategically, mathematically, an d predictably, we l l almost? Almos t lik e a chessboard whe r e eac h individual member i s als o serving it s b e st interests? Perh a ps a s w e design computer algorithms f o r t h e small-scale o r th e largest scale w e wi l l begin t o s ee th e s a me thing, an d wha t w e learn w i ll propel u s furthe r a nd faster i n to t h e future.
Ther e w a s a n interesting article i n Photonics o n September 27, 2012 titled; "Nanotubes Project Holograms," w hich noted that;
"Holograms c a n b e generated b y harnessing t h e conductive a nd light-scattering qualities o f carbon nanotubes, a development t h at cou l d lead t o crisper projections wit h a larger field o f view. Ma n y scientists beli e ve tha t carbon nanotubes wil l b e a t t h e heart o f future industry an d human endeavor a nd wil l h a ve a n impact o n solar cells, cancer treatments a n d optical imaging. Researchers us e d thes e nanotubes a s th e smallest-ever scattering elements t o create a static holographic projection."
T h e applications f o r a ll th i s a r e incredible a nd i t co u ld revolutionize everything, ch a nge A L L o f human technology; communication, computers, transportation, energy, healthcare, a n d y o u n a me it, j ust co n sider th e realities here? Wo u ld i t b e s o bold t o suggest t h at someday;
9.) A n A I Super Decision Making Computer Cou l d B e Running Human Civilizations?
Interestingly enough, I h a ve deeply considered th e future eRepublic o r eGovernment A I decision making system, enterprise software super computer concept. I f i t wer e no t corrupted b y humans i t c ould work well, programmed benevolence - i f t hat i s poss i ble a n d i f th e programmers ar e o n t he s ame page o f liberty, freedom, an d standardization o f s ome aspects a nd basic infrastructure needs. T h e anarchists migh t n ot l ike it, th e crony capitalists wo u ld tr y t o corrupt it, th e socialists wou l d w ant t o control it, t h e religious fanatics w o uld wa n t t o destroy it, a nd s o o n - a g ain humans, b u t living i n su c h a system designed fo r liberty a n d freedom "I thi n k i t wo u ld b e a good idea" paraphrasing Gandhi o n Western Society.
W hat I' m sayi n g o r askin g rater is; co u ld w e e v er ge t human populations t o agree t o live w i th thi s e ven i f w e co u ld prove t o t h em mathematically t hat wou l d b e i n th e ir be s t interests? A r e humans technology re a dy f or t h at yet? I w o uld suggest yo u t hat th e y s hould b e g etting rea d y f o r t hat bec a use t h ey a re current l y training A I supercomputer decision-making machines t o d o ju s t tha t i n th e future, a s humans ar e putting a l l o f t h eir knowledge o nto th e Internet. Y o u s ee m y point?
C
10.) Innovation, Trial a nd Error, a n d Original Thinking
No t lon g ago, I w as discussing t his w i th a n acquaintance o f mine f r om ac r oss t he pon d a n d h e suggested that; "Most innovations m i ght b e jus t applications o f trial a n d error." I s h e right? Yes, a good portion r e ally i s so, that ' s true enough. Indeed, isn' t i t s o that; tho s e wh o k n ow th a t m ay ha v e learned i t thr o ugh th e adversity o f failure, find them s elves i n a p lace wh e re the y refuse t o qui t fo r th e nex t round, eventually th a t leads t o success due t o strength o f character.Thus, thos e who've achieved h ave proven t h ey ha v e th e rig h t stuff, an d h ave worked t o solve r eal problems, b ut y o u can ' t solve re a l problems b y practicing "the definition o f insanity" whic h i s generally h o w humans "following t he leader" u sually ge t there, a s t hey hire tho s e experts w h o go t t hem in t o th e hot water i n t h e f i rst pla c e (refer back t o Einstein's quote), learning fr o m thei r success, bu t n o t t h eir failures a s mentioned abo v e
No t lon g ago, I w as discussing t his w i th a n acquaintance o f mine f r om ac r oss t he pon d a n d h e suggested that; "Most innovations m i ght b e jus t applications o f trial a n d error." I s h e right? Yes, a good portion r e ally i s so, that ' s true enough. Indeed, isn' t i t s o that; tho s e wh o k n ow th a t m ay ha v e learned i t thr o ugh th e adversity o f failure, find them s elves i n a p lace wh e re the y refuse t o qui t fo r th e nex t round, eventually th a t leads t o success due t o strength o f character.Thus, thos e who've achieved h ave proven t h ey ha v e th e rig h t stuff, an d h ave worked t o solve r eal problems, b ut y o u can ' t solve re a l problems b y practicing "the definition o f insanity" whic h i s generally h o w humans "following t he leader" u sually ge t there, a s t hey hire tho s e experts w h o go t t hem in t o th e hot water i n t h e f i rst pla c e (refer back t o Einstein's quote), learning fr o m thei r success, bu t n o t t h eir failures a s mentioned abo v e